Necessity versus Nostalgia – The Destruction of the Country House – The British Newspaper Archive Blog

Blog

Necessity versus Nostalgia – The Destruction of the Country House

Held in 1974 at the Victoria & Albert Museum, the Destruction of the Country House exhibition highlighted how stately homes across the British Isles had been demolished throughout the course of the twentieth century, in what some called a ‘cultural tragedy.’ In this special blog, we will explore how the British Newspaper Archive can shed more light upon this curious phenomenon, which saw approximately one country house being demolished every five days in 1955.

Illustrated London News | 1 November 1974

Searching the terms ‘country house demolished’ in the Archive throws up thousands of results, from the offhand mentions – here the Sevenoaks Chronicle & Kentish Advertiser describes how a twin-engined Messerschmitt crashed near ‘the site of a large country house which was demolished a few years ago’ in 1940 – to descriptions of actual demolitions taking place, like this one in the Birmingham Daily Post, which reports how an eighteenth-century country house, Farthinghoe Lodge, was destroyed by a Royal Engineers bomb disposal unit using 500lb of plastic explosives in 1960.

From 1900 some 1200 country houses in England were demolished, with an estimated one in six country homes being destroyed. In Scotland, the figure was proportionally higher. But why were so many country houses destroyed? We can find the answers in the pages of the British Newspaper Archive.

In a tongue-in-cheek article published by the Daily Mirror, 9 October 1974, which announces the forthcoming V&A exhibition, Roger Todd writes:

Gad…our stately homes are grim! Life in Britain’s stately homes is becoming simply too awful for the coronet set. Dukes, baronets and earls have to use buckets to catch rain dripping through the roofs. They shiver in front of electric fires because the central heating is faulty.

By 1974 the aristocracy and their grand country homes were very much at the end of their heyday. This decline had its roots many years before. Rising taxes – both income tax and death duties – meant that estate owners had less money with which to maintain their homes. A tremendous social shift post World War Two also meant that there were no longer the staff willing to work as servants when there were so many opportunities elsewhere.

But why demolish these houses, which many saw as cultural gems? And what did people at the time think about their destruction?

An article in the Cheshire Observer, 26 October 1960, covers the impending demolition of Eaton Hall, country house of the Duke of Westminster. The reason for its demolition is its reputed dry rot. The paper states how many locals ‘were reluctant to say anything about the Hall and its future,’ but lodgekeeper Mr Harold Barwick was full of regret for the days which have ‘gone forever.’

Cheshire Observer | 26 March 1960

Having come to Eaton Hall to convalesce after being injured at the Somme in 1916, Harold Barwick became its lodgekeeper in 1917. He recalls his full livery and the famous guests, who numbered Winston Churchill, and laments his current ‘twopence ha’penny business’ garb.  As he looks ‘over the sun dappled fields and woods to the spires of Eaton Hall’ he says sadly and simply: ‘I shall miss it.’

The vicar of nearby Eccleston, Rev Eric Jones, neatly sums up the dichotomy of the time: ‘For years the Hall has been a white elephant, and I suppose there is no alternative to what is happening. There is not so much an affection for the mansion itself, but nostalgia for the old days.’

Indeed, the prevailing attitude reflected in the press is one of sadness, that an old world and old way of life has truly passed, and a need for progress to take the place of such nostalgia.

This is again witnessed in the demolition of Tong Castle, which was demolished in July 1954. Built in the eighteenth century in a unique Georgian-Gothic style by Capability Brown, it had lain empty since the First World War, and the building had become something of a shell.

The Sphere | 17 July 1954

The demolition of such stately homes was seen as something of a spectator sport, with many attending the destruction of Tong Castle, as detailed in a Birmingham Daily Post article of 1954. The Territorial Army, as part of their training, laid the charges, and when the 120lb of explosives were detonated, ‘the whole structure rose about ten feet into the air and then collapsed into a heap of rubble.’

Tony Durant was amongst the crowd; his direct ancestor General George Durant had bought Tong Castle in 1760. His comment on the day’s proceedings echoes the sentiments of Reverend Jones: ‘it is a rather sad sight to see it all down, but I suppose it is necessary and a sign of the times.’

The Sphere | 17 July 1954

However, by the 1970s, attitudes had begun to change. This was highlighted by the campaign to save Mentmore Towers. Its owner, the sixth Lord Roseberry, died in 1974 with crippling death duties of £4 million. The government was reluctant to intervene, and its contents was sold in 1977, in what was deemed ‘Britain’s biggest art sale.’ Indeed, the auction required a five volume catalogue, which itself cost £30.

Mentmore Towers | Illustrated London News | 1 March 1977

As time went on, country houses were no longer a reminder of days that could be easily remembered, but of a distant, unfamiliar and increasingly glamorous past. They began to pay for themselves via tourism, with 50 million people visiting 600 stately homes in Britain by 1992. As such, the demolitions began to slow, but the twentieth century had already wrought a phase of irreversible destruction upon Britain’s architectural gems, which can be traced in the pages of the British Newspaper Archive.

Tags

,

Leave a reply:

Your email address will not be published.

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *